Ivanka Trump behaves the other way around: don't behave like Ivanka

Some days ago Ivanka Trump He shared this image on his Instagram account visiting the zoo, with an elephant in the background, which generated quite controversy because the children of Donald Trump are fond of hunting and have been seen in Africa killing animals.

But not only because of that, but also because although the baby carrier he uses is, in theory, designed for it (it is called Ergobaby 360 in reference to the fact that the child can go ergonomically looking in and out), the reality is very different: the child goes the other way around as he should go because he is not in an ergonomic position.

Why the other way around?

Well, because today no baby carrier allows a child to face the world in an ergonomic position. Not even this brand Ergobaby which had always been differentiated by creating ergonomic backpacks. Perhaps to reach more public or with the intention of doing something new, it was unmarked with this strange backpack in which the babies looking out are better than in the so-called colgonas, but worse than if they face the carrier.

Legs flex forward, not backward

One of the reasons why it is logical for the baby to wrap the body of the person who carries it is that your legs flex forward and not backward. It's like a hug, it's a relationship from you to you. It is to take the baby in arms, allow it to surround our body and fix it to us with a cloth or backpack. That is to behave comfortably for him and for us.

It is the most natural, but it is also the best, because the ideal position of the baby's legs is in position of M, as we told you some time ago. Thus, the femur is in a correct position with respect to the pelvis and not only develops better, but we prevent that joint can suffer some type of dislocation or subluxation (for example, when a baby is born with a subluxation of the hip the treatment it is precisely that he adopts the same posture as when he is behaved in an ergonomic manner).

In the backpacks, it is easier for the hip to develop improperly than with the one in the photo (because the leg falls further down), but in this we cannot talk about the position of M because the knees are lower than the hip.

The back has to make a C, not the opposite

When we talk about the back having to have a normal C curvature, as if the baby were more or less sitting, we mean the natural position of the back, and not the opposite. If we carry the other way around, the baby can do a reverse C, especially if the carrier has a belly or, in the case of the woman, has a large chest or is pregnant.

Come on, that way the baby goes too straight, or even with the back inverted, dropping even more weight in his genital or inguinal area. It is assumed that the baby's weight in the baby carrier has to be distributed between his back, his buttocks and his legs, and not that all the weight is supported by the genitals or a very small area of ​​the legs (in the photo, the baby distributes weight up to half a leg, but not as sitting as it should be).

With your back to you, worse for your back

In addition, the carrier's back has to endure more weight in front if it goes backwards, because the baby's legs move away from our body and that makes us forced to compensate by pulling back a little, doing more damage in the long run.

Come on, they are already looking forward to suffering if it turns out that we can take the child to the back, where not only will he be better, but we will be better off. They say it to the German doctors: better not take them to the world.